Notice: Undefined offset: 1 in /var/www/ijprcp.com/article-detail-page.php on line 103
A Clinical Perspective on the Therapeutic Impact of Mulligan’s Dynamic Approach versus Kaltenborn’s Static Posterior Mobilization in Enhancing Shoulder Joint Kinetics and Reducing Disability in Adhesive Capsulitis
 
  • E-ISSN 2583-6056
  • Follow us

International Journal of Physiotherapy Research and Clinical Practice

Article

International Journal of Physiotherapy Research and Clinical Practice

Year: 2024, Volume: 3, Issue: 2, Pages: 21–24

Original Article

A Clinical Perspective on the Therapeutic Impact of Mulligan’s Dynamic Approach versus Kaltenborn’s Static Posterior Mobilization in Enhancing Shoulder Joint Kinetics and Reducing Disability in Adhesive Capsulitis

Abstract

A frequent ailment that usually affects people between the ages of 40 and 60, adhesive Capsulitis is marked by pain and limited shoulder movement. Physiotherapy, including joint mobilization techniques, is often used to alleviate symptoms. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of two manual therapeutic techniques—Mulligan’s Mobilization with Movement (MWM) and Kaltenborn’s posterior mobilization— in helping Adhesive Capsulitis patients with shoulder function and pain reduction. The study was quasi-experimentalwith 40 participants (aged 35-70 years) diagnosed with adhesive capsulitis. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups: Mulligan's MWM was given to Group B, whereas Kaltenborn's posterior mobilization was given to Group Aboth combined with ultrasound therapy and conventional treatments over 3 weeks. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Shoulder Pain and impairment Index (SPADI) were used to quantify pain and impairment before and after treatment. Both techniques resulted in significant reduction in pain and disability (p < 0.001). However, Group B (Mulligan’s MWM) showed more pronounced improvements, with greater reductions in both VAS and SPADI scores than Group A (Kaltenborn’s mobilization), suggesting a more effective treatment approach. This study provides a direct comparison between Mulligan’s MWM and Kaltenborn’s posterior mobilization for managing adhesive capsulitis, highlighting the superior effectivenessof Mulligan’s technique in improving pain relief and functional outcomes.

Keywords: Adhesive capsulitis, Mulligan's Mobilization with Movement, Kaltenborn's mobilization, Shoulder pain, Disability

References

  1. Millar NL, Meakins A, Struyf F, Willmore E, Campbell AL, Kirwan PD. Adhesive capsulitis. Nature Reviews Disease Primers. 2022;8(1):59. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-022-00386-2
  2. Pandey V, Madi S. Clinical Guidelines in the Management of Frozen Shoulder: An Update! Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. 2021;55(2):299–309. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-021-00351-3
  3. Rezwan AKM, Shahriar TM, Rasal ANM, Rahman M, Haque T, Sharmin NA. Study on Effectiveness of Kaltenborn Mobilization Techniques Grade III in Patient with Frozen Stage of Adhesive Capsulitis of Shoulder Joint. European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences. 2021;3(5):50–53. Available from: https://doi.org/10.24018/ejmed.2021.3.5.1050
  4. Anwar M, Mughal MW, Izhar N, Rasheed M. Effectiveness of Maitland Mobilization Technique in Comparison with Mulligan Mobilization Technique in Management of Frozen Shoulder. Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences. 2023;17(5):57–60. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs202317557
  5. Husna I, Mizbah Z, Kandakurti PK, Arulsingh W. Does manual therapy techniques help in patients with adhesive capsulitis - A systematic review of literature. Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 2022;34(2):1–28. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1615/critrevphysrehabilmed.2022043235
  6. Muhammad U, Aqsa A, Nida K, Misbah M, Hiba R. Effectiveness of Kaltenborn mobilization versus muscle energy technique on shoulder range of motion in adhesive capsulitis. Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College (Print). 2023;27(3):1959. Available from: https://doi.org/10.37939/jrmc.v27i3.1959
  7. Chandrasekaran K, MSS, PSS, AVR, SS, Rathnapandi V. A comparative study on the effectiveness of Mulligan mobilization versus Positional release therapy technique in patients with Adhesive capsulitis. International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2021;12(1):1–5. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26452/IJRPS.V12I1.3904
  8. Duzgun I, Turgut E, Eraslan L, Elbasan B, Oskay D, Atay OA. Which method for frozen shoulder mobilization: manual posterior capsule stretching or scapular mobilization? Journal of Musculoskeletal & Neuronal Interactions. 2019;19(3):311–316. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31475938/
  9. Zhang J, Zhong S, Tan T, Li J, Liu S, Sun P. Comparisons of Non-Surgical Interventions for Frozen Shoulder: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. SSRN Preprint. 2019;p. 1–33. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3468379
  10. Oliveira SPd, Medeiros DBd, Lucena MMBd, Fernandes SRT. Efeitos da mobilização no tratamento de paciente com capsuliteadesiva: revisão integrativa. Revista Interfaces: Saúde, Humanas e Tecnologia. 2023;10(3):1585–1588. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.16891/2317-434x.v10.e3.a2022.pp1585-1584
  11. Rathod D, Priyanka G, Palkar A. Comparative Study of Kaltenborn Mobilisation versus Mulligan Mobilisation in Patients with Frozen Shoulder. International Journal of Health Sciences and Research. 2019;9(9):320–324. Available from: https://www.ijhsr.org/IJHSR_Vol.9_Issue.9_Sep2019/49.pdf
  12. Yeole UL, Dighe PD, Gharote GM, Panse RS, Shweta A, Pawar PA. Effectiveness of movement with mobilization in adhesive capsulitis of shoulder: Randomized controlled trial. Indian Journal of Medical Research and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2017;4(2):1–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.266638

Copyright

@ 2024 Published by Krupanidhi College of Physiotherapy. This is an open-access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

DON'T MISS OUT!

Subscribe now for latest articles and news.