Notice: Undefined offset: 1 in /var/www/ijprcp.com/article-detail-page.php on line 103
Motor Control Theories in Physiotherapy: Implications for Current Clinical Practice
 
  • E-ISSN 2583-6056
  • Follow us

International Journal of Physiotherapy Research and Clinical Practice

Article

International Journal of Physiotherapy Research and Clinical Practice

Year: 2025, Volume: 4, Issue: 1, Pages: 14–18

Review Article

Motor Control Theories in Physiotherapy: Implications for Current Clinical Practice

Abstract

Motor control theories have long served as the foundation for understanding movement and guiding rehabilitation in physiotherapy. These frameworks offer insights into how the body and brain coordinate actions, adapt to environments, and learn or re-learn motor tasks. This narrative review explores the main motor control theories—reflex, hierarchical, motor programming, systems, dynamic systems, and ecological—and discusses their relevance and integration in current physiotherapy practice. Each theory offers unique contributions to understanding human movement, and modern physiotherapy benefits from combining these perspectives. An integrative, patient-centered approach allows for more effective, adaptable, and functionally meaningful interventions across diverse populations. While no single model is comprehensive, their collective application forms a robust foundation for clinical reasoning, rehabilitation planning, and outcome evaluation. Future work should focus on bridging theoretical models with practical tools, improving accessibility and impact in real-world therapy settings.

Keywords: Motor control, Physiotherapy, Movement rehabilitation, Clinical reasoning

References

  1. Aloraini SM, Gelley G, Passmore S. Motor control and learning theories in the study of balance: A scoping review. Journal of Exercise, Movement, and Sport. 2017;49(1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.16958/jer.49.1.1499scapps.org
  2. Bernstein NA. The coordination and regulation of movements. (p. 196 pages) Pergamon Press. 1967.
  3. Coker CA. Behavioral theories of motor control. In: Motor learning and control for practitioners (4). (pp. 77-108) Routledge. 2017.
  4. Colquhoun HL, Levac D, O'Brien KK, et al. Scoping reviews: Time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2014;67(12):1291–1294. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013
  5. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, et al. Sarcopenia: Revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age and Ageing. 2019;48(1):16–31. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afy169
  6. Dick MB, Hsieh S, Dick-Muehlke C, Davis DS, Cotman CW. The Variability of Practice Hypothesis in Motor Learning: Does It Apply to Alzheimer's Disease? Brain and Cognition. 2000;44:470–489. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1006/brcg.2000.1206
  7. Dewald JPA, Pope PS, Given JD, Buchanan TS, Rymer WZ. Abnormal muscle coactivation patterns during isometric torque generation at the elbow and shoulder in hemiparetic subjects. Brain. 1995;118(2):495–510. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/118.2.495
  8. Elliott D. Intermittent Versus Continuous Control of Manual Aiming Movements. In: Advances in Psychology. (Vol. 85, pp. 33-48) Elsevier . 1992.
  9. Flanagan JR, Vetter P, Johansson RS, Wolpert DM. Prediction Precedes Control in Motor Learning. Current Biology. 2003;13(2):146–150. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00007-1
  10. Gallagher S. How the body shapes the mind. (p. 296 pages) Oxford University Press. 2005.
  11. Kimpo RR, Rinaldi JM, Kim CK, Payne HL, Raymond JL. Gating of neural error signals during motor learning. eLife. 2014;3:1–23. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.02076
  12. Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessell TM. Principles of neural science (4). (p. 1414 pages) McGraw-Hill. 2000.
  13. Latash ML. Neurophysiological Basis of Motor Control. (p. 427 pages) Human Kinetics . 2008.
  14. Lee TD, Genovese ED. Distribution of Practice in Motor Skill Acquisition: Learning and Performance Effects Reconsidered. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 1988;59(4):277–287. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1988.10609373
  15. Magill RA. Motor Learning and Control. Concepts and Applications. (p. 482 pages) McGraw-Hill. 2007.
  16. Molina-Rueda F, Cruz SPdl. Reflections on Physical Therapy: motor learning, how our patients learn? Issues of Physiotherapy. 2010;39(3):211–218. Available from: https://doi.org/10.48047/CU
  17. Perrin PP, Roussel M. Theories of motor control: Implications for rehabilitation. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 1993;7(3):187–193. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/154596839300700303
  18. Rothwell J. Control of human voluntary movement (2). Chapman & Hall. 1994.
  19. Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (3). Human Kinetics. 1999.
  20. Shadmehr R, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. The Journal of Neuroscience. 1994;14(5 Pt 2):3208–3224. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.14-05-03208.1994
  21. Thelen E, Spencer JP. Postural Control During Reaching in Young Infants: A Dynamic Systems Approach. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 1998;22(4):507–514. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0149-7634(97)00037-7

Copyright

@ 2025 Published by Krupanidhi College of Physiotherapy. This is an open-access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

DON'T MISS OUT!

Subscribe now for latest articles and news.