• E-ISSN 2583-6056
  • Follow us

International Journal of Physiotherapy Research and Clinical Practice

Article

International Journal of Physiotherapy Research and Clinical Practice

Year: 2025, Volume: 4, Issue: 2, Pages: 1-7

Original Article

Trends and Characteristics of Preventive Spinal Health Screening: An Observational Analysis of 3000 individuals with ODI-based Functional Outcomes

Abstract

Spine-related disorders are among the leading global causes of disability, with increasing prevalence across all age groups due to sedentary lifestyles, poor posture, and age-related degeneration. There is a growing need for targeted interventions that address functional limitations through individualized care. This study evaluates the effectiveness of age-specific, personalized spinal interventions in a cohort of 3,000 patients treated at a dedicated spine health center. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), a validated tool for measuring spine-related disability. A total of 3,000 patients underwent comprehensive assessment and individualized treatment based on age, functional impairment, postural anomalies, and diagnostic imaging. Pre- and post-treatment ODI scores were compared across age groups (10–89 years). Data were analyzed for trends in baseline disability and improvement rates. The overall mean ODI score decreased from 24.53 to 15.35, representing a 37.4% improvement in functional status. The most notable improvement was seen in the 20–29 age group (48.4%), while the 80–89 group also exhibited a meaningful 31.0% improvement despite high baseline disability. A U-shaped pattern in baseline scores was observed, with higher disability in both younger (10–19) and older (80–89) cohorts. Age-stratified analysis revealed that tailored interventions yield substantial functional improvements across the lifespan. Younger patients respond more robustly, yet older adults also benefit significantly from structured rehabilitation. These findings advocate for individualized, age-sensitive treatment models and emphasize early intervention and functional goal alignment for improved outcomes in spinal health

Keywords: Spine health screening, Oswestry disability index ODI, Age specific rehabilitation, Personalized spine care, Functional outcomes, Postural and radiological assessment

References

  1. Knezevic NN, Candido KD, Vlaeyen JWS, Zundert JV, Cohen SP. Low back pain. The Lancet. 2021;398:78–92. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00733-9
  2. Guruvulu RH, Tadagonda SK, Damerla T. Rebalancing the Spine: A Novel Approach to Managing Quadratus Lumborum Dysfunction and Improving Spinal Mobility- A Case Report. International Journal of Physiotherapy Research and Clinical Practice. 2024;3(4):5–10. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.54839/ijprcp.v3i4.36
  3. Mattiuzzi C, Lippi G, Bovo C. Current epidemiology of low back pain. Journal of Hospital Management and Health Policy. 2020;4:1–6. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jhmhp-20-17
  4. Bortkiewicz A, Gadzicka E, Szymczak W. Mobile phone use and risk for intracranial tumors and salivary gland tumors – A meta-analysis. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health. 2017;30(1):27–43. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00802
  5. Vitaz TW, Raque GH, Shields CB, Glassman SD. Surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in patients older than 75 years of age. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 1999;91(2):181–185. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.3171/spi.1999.91.2.0181
  6. Qi L, Luo L, Meng X, Zhang J, Yu T, Nie X, et al. Risk factors for lumbar disc herniation in adolescents and young adults: A case–control study. Frontiers in Surgery. 2023;9:1–8. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1009568
  7. Micheli LJ. Back Pain in Young Athletes. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine. 1995;149(1):15–18. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.1995.02170130017004
  8. Dunstan DW, Howard B, Healy GN, Owen N. Too much sitting – A health hazard. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 2012;97(3):368–376. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2012.05.020
  9. Wong AY, Karppinen J, Samartzis D. Low back pain in older adults: risk factors, management options and future directions. Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders. 2017;12(1):1–23. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13013-017-0121-3
  10. Delitto A, George SZ, Dillen LV, Whitman JM, Sowa G, Shekelle P, et al. Low Back Pain. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2012;42(4):A1–A57. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2012.42.4.a1
  11. Davidson M, Keating JL. A Comparison of Five Low Back Disability Questionnaires: Reliability and Responsiveness. Physical Therapy. 2002;82(1):8–24. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ptj/82.1.8
  12. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(22):2940–2952. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200011150-00017

Copyright

© 2025 Published by Krupanidhi College of Physiotherapy. This is an open-access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

DON'T MISS OUT!

Subscribe now for latest articles and news.